Prof. Varadarajan drew heavy criticism for a “Forbes” column he wrote in which he coined the term “going Muslim” as a replacement for the term “going postal,” in response to the shooting at the Fort Hood military base. The term itself “implies violence that results from ‘snapping psychologically’.” Varadarajan continued to qualify his statement by arguing that in the case of ‘going Muslim’, there would be a “calculated discarding of camouflage – the camouflage of integration – in an act of revolutionary catharsis.
Explaining his position, Varadarajan argued that “Muslims may be more extreme because their religion is founded on bellicose conquest, a contempt for infidels and an obligation for piety that is more extensive than in other schemes.”
 Ratnatunga, S. (Nov, 12, 2009). Stern Professor Perpetuates Anti-Muslim Rhetoric. NYU Local. Retrieved from https://nyulocal.com/stern-professor-perpetuates-anti-muslim-rhetoric-5ed63281e2c4
 Hamilton, N. (Nov. 10, 2009). The Anti-Muslim Backlash Outrage-Off, Vol. 1. Gawker. Retrieved from http://gawker.com/5401392/the-anti-muslim-backlash-outrage-off-vol-1
 Louis, E. (Nov. 15, 2009). Don’t Jump to Conclusions Because Hasan is Muslim. Real Clear Politics. Retrieved from https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2009/11/15/don039t_jump_to_conclusions_because_hasan_is_muslim_224655.html